Rental Review: 2014 Chrysler 300
Oft forgotten yet totally adequate, the
second generation Chrysler 300 is a fine cruiser that feels not
dissimilar to what one would expect two-thirds of a late model Lexus
LS to be. Though the styling is not nearly distinctive as it was in
its first iteration, the 300 still stands out in its price range as
one of the few remaining rear-wheel-drive, American-minded land
yachts that focuses on reasonably priced luxury and comfort and not
much else.
Follow the jump to continue reading...
Outside, things are relatively good.
Subtle but identifiable, the design makes for a mature and reserved
appearance, moving upscale from the previous model's look-at-me
Rolls-Royce mockery. Especially in the current era of out-do the
next outrageous styling, there's a lot to say for clean lines and
grown-up good looks. But yet, the 300 blends in with most other
sedans. It's an unoffensive design, but it's not striking either.
That's not to say it isn't good looking, but the competition has
caught up to the car that once essentially had the public's undivided
attention in the looks department.
Interior styling as a whole is decent,
and understandably somewhat bland as this is a base model living the
rough fleet life. The highlight of the interior for me is the gauges
which have a cool, crisp Chrysler sort of feel to them, if that's a
thing. They're backed by a soothing blue glow that's clean, nice to
look at, and easy to read. If not second only to cruising ride
quality, a luxury car's seats are of utmost importance, and though
the 300's thrones have an almost entirely flat profile and zero
bolstering whatsoever, they're still plenty good. Though not the
couch-like, total comfort that is found in a Lexus, the seats do
easily meet cross-country road trip levels of comfort. A quick gripe
about the interior: in an age when premium cars are loaded with
exceedingly futuristic tech, the analog clock that sits atop the
300's dash seems entirely out of place and a step backwards in
design. I get that it's a hat tip to models of yore and that the
super-luxury, upmarket companies include this as well, but you don't
build class-leading cars by looking to the past. It might just be
time to move on from the analog clock.
Unsurprisingly mostly option-free, my
rental 300 did have the always-great UConnect system sitting
dead-center. Strangely though, the screen is angled forward making
operation fairly awkward; it's verges on counter-intuitive and
contradicts the great placement of the identical screen in other FCA
products. Additionally, the interface itself seems to be “dulled
down” from its application in other vehicles, with bigger fonts,
simpler and less cluttered icons, and greater contrast with most of
the colors being fairly basic and easy to pick out. UConnect is
honestly a worse looking piece of equipment here in its seemingly
more basic design, but maybe they just know their target market...
The 300 is a big, big car and as such
it battles a few drawbacks. Larger feeling even than its LX
platform-mates the Charger and Challenger, the 300's substantial size
and girth are only made less apparent by a floaty, cloud-like ride
and artificially light steering. Lighter colors do manage to hide
the car's heft reasonably well, with the gray of my rental disguising
its yacht-like side planes admirably. There's no mistaking it
though, this is a big car. Side-by-side it might seem nearly the
same size as its Challenger cousin, but whereas 18” wheels look
just a little small on the Dodge, the same diameter on the 300 looks
absolutely tiny. The car's size also translates to the interior in
that that there's no conceivable way a normal-sized human can rest
his/her arm on the window sill unless you lean noticeably and
uncomfortably leftward towards the door itself (I tried; felt &
looked like a fool). Here it differs from the Challenger as well,
but in increasing the width and broadening the shoulder room it does
help the car feel more open and airy, and there no doubting American
consumers are known to associate size with luxury; bigger is better,
right? Good thing the 300 is huge.
As I mentioned before, the most crucial
element a car in this class has to succeed at is unquestionably
cruising comfort. The 300 accomplishes this goal handily, and that
it feels every bit of its weight certainly helps the big luxo-cruiser
create a feeling that is substantial, planted, confident, and
stately. Ride quality is quite good and while you won't be mistaking
it for a Lexus, it is very comfortable. The chassis isn't terribly
upset by any big bumps, and it makes small work of uneven surfaces
that others transmit directly to the spine. It drives exactly as
you'd expect: smoothly, quietly, and solidly.
Forward visibility is great, and the
300 is perfectly comfortable sitting at 65-70 MPH where it hums at a
low 1700 RPM and returns over 30 miles per gallon. Pentastar's
ever-good V6 is mated to a ZF 8-speed transmission which works nicely
and suits the car's laid-back charisma well. Unfortunately the lack
of paddle shifters means that finding the proper gear can be tricky,
for example trying to make a pass on an uphill section of highway;
there's a noticeable delay upon pressing the accelerator after which
it drops down a bunch of gears all at once and makes a bit of a
racket doing so. Otherwise the car's powertrain is adequate, with
its sweet spot right around the highway speed limit and going any
faster giving you the sense it could use thirty extra horsepower or
so to offset its mass and prevent it from dropping down into seventh
when you demand a bit more of the six-cylinder mill. The V8 model is
definitely a good choice if you don't have the patience for a
semi-lethargic gearbox trying to eek every ounce out of an engine
better suited to lighter cars. The 300's Eco mode is indicated by a
light inset on the gauge pod that turns on and off when it's
activated, but for the life of me I could not figure out what
dictates it being in Eco mode or not (I've settled on theorizing that
it's load-dependent). Regardless, whatever it is that Eco mode does
certainly helps seeing as I averaged an indicated 29.2 MPG and still
had 260 miles worth of range at half-tank, making it an easy 500+
mile highway cruiser on a single fill, further contributing to its
road-trip credentials and also proving to be surprisingly efficient.
Hustle it through a turn, however, and you start to feel every single
pound of it in the body roll and understeer (rental car tires don't
help this). The steering can be artificially light at times and
would benefit from a little extra weight to it to comply with the
car's otherwise buttoned-down, solid and heavy feel, but the average
300 buyer probably cares very, very little about steering feel, and
if they did they would probably have been looking at the Charger
rather than the 300 in the first place.
Overall I wasn't blown away by the 300
but it didn't fail to provide comfortable, efficient, and pleasant
means of travel while my car was in for service. Especially at the
roughly $34,000 I figured my rental would sticker at (based on
build-&-price on Chrysler's website), the 300 presents a good
value proposition for a buyer looking for a big, rear-wheel-drive
luxury sedan. Everything about it felt like two-thirds of a recent
Lexus LS, which is flattering on some levels but when you consider
that the current LS dates back to 2006 it can be a bit of an insult.
Rather though, I like to look at it in that a middle-class American
sedan is on par with the ever-great top-of-the-line Japanese dynasty
that is the Lexus LS model, even if the current generation of that
car has been out for quite a while. It may be that the 300's styling
no longer stands out is a metaphor for how we're becoming used to the
fact that American cars are now generally recognized as good, and
seeing one that's good out in the real world no longer demands your
attention because we're simply used to it. What was once a breakout
star, a car that was a sight to behold and a return to the old-style
American way of building sedans, the Chrysler 300 has now become a
regular, almost undistinguished vehicle that soldiers on alongside
the steroid-fed, attention-demanding Charger. The 300 was at the
forefront of a revolution for American cars, but now it's become a
dulled-down, oft-forgotten option in the wide world of sedans. I
almost wish this second-gen. 300 were more extreme, a little more
like its predecessor; a little energy could go a long way in reviving
what's a really solid yet fairly bland car, and one that absolutely
deserves a look if your priorities are equal parts luxury and budget.
If it wants to hit big sales again it needs to move forward, and
maybe FCA's new-found energy can give it the attention it needs to
make a statement once again as it did upon introduction over ten
years ago.
-Ross, 12/7/15
Thanks for sharing your review of your Chrysler 300 rental. I liked stopping by to get your fulled details on your experience. Have a wonderful rest of your day and keep up the posts.
ReplyDeleteClassic Body Worx